Editor’s note: HRM Eze Israel Okwu Kanu is the
father of one of Nigeria’s controversial detainees, Nnamdi Kanu. He is
the traditional ruler of Isiama Afara, a community in Umuahia, Abia
state. In an interview with Ihuoma Chiedozie of The Punch newspaper,
Kanu senior talks about the personality of his son, the conflict
with Ralph Uwazuruike, a former leader of the Movement for the
Actualisation of Biafra (MASSOB), and pleads with the government to set
his son free.
Read the extracts below:
About Nnamdi Kanu and his character
While growing up, he was a very bright boy, very intelligent and
brilliant and he was very serious with his studies. He was quite
serious-minded for his age, which obviously informed his decision to
leave the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, where he was studying as an
undergraduate, for Europe, in order to finish his studies, following
delays occasioned by incessant strikes by the university’s academic and
non-academic staff.
When he got to Europe, the authorities there were impressed with him
and took him up; they gave him admission, noting that he was very
brilliant. It was determination that propelled him to move to Europe to
complete his studies.
I used to observe him with his peers, whenever they were arguing or
debating one thing or the other, he would usually enlighten them,
telling the others what was the real fact. He was very knowledgeable and
sometimes his mates would wonder how he knew more than them. They would
ask him, ‘How come you know all these? Where did you get the
information?’ With time, I discovered he was talented, especially in
current affairs and history. He was really versatile and had vast
knowledge on most subjects. Beyond that, he was a well-behaved boy who
always did what was expected of him.
No, he was not a troublemaker. In fact he went out of his way to
avoid trouble. If anything would cause a quarrel between him and
anybody, he would rather avoid such a matter. He was actually
peace-loving and gentle. Also, he was not a person of many words, he was
reserved. But what I noticed about him, as he was growing up, was that
he detested injustice. He did not like to see a fellow human being
victimised. He would never be part of anything that involved the
persecution, or victimisation of a fellow human being. He was very
straight forward and honest to a fault. Nnamdi would never see the truth
and keep quiet, he would speak out, not minding the consequences.
About Kanu / Uwazuruike rift
Nnamdi witnessed how Ralph Uwazuruike, a former leader of the
Movement for the Actualisation of Biafra (MASSOB) was running MASSOB
then. He went there (MASSOB) and found out that what Uwazuruike was
doing was not right. He called Uwazuruike aside and asked him: ‘The
money you are collecting (in the name of Biafra), can’t you give some of
it to these poor ones among your members so that they can at least feed
themselves and their families?’ Uwazuruike got angry and asked who gave
him (Nnamdi) the right to make such comments. That led to problems
between him and Uwazuruike.
When Nnamdi came home to get married, Uwazuruike stormed the venue of
the traditional wedding with his people to disrupt the wedding.
Uwazuruike and his group came in 10 buses to cause disturbances at the
venue. I was at home waiting for them to bring the new bride to me, as
Igbo tradition demands, when I got information that Uwazuruike brought
his men to cause trouble there. It got to a point that the youths from
my son’s wife’s community rallied together to confront Uwazuruike’s
boys, captured about 20 of them and took them to the police. But Nnamdi
was beaten up seriously and he sustained injuries. When he returned
home, I took him to the hospital for treatment. After he recovered, he
swore to go ahead with the struggle for Biafra, but without Uwazuruike.
He said the struggle could be successfully undertaken in a different
way, without it being used as a means for self-enrichment, as was done
by Uwazuruike. That was how he got involved in the struggle for Biafra.
MASSOB nearly killed my son!
When Nnamdi went there (MASSOB) and found out what Uwazuruike was
actually doing, Nnamdi challenged him and they began to have problems.
They nearly killed Nnamdi at that time. Initially, Nnamdi opened a radio
house in Enugu, but Uwazuruike and his group went there to destroy it.
There were so many other cases.
The problem was that Uwazuruike was allegedly using the money he was
getting in the name of the pro-Biafra struggle to enrich himself and
develop his estate, but not helping his members and followers, most of
whom were very poor. Nnamdi did not like that and spoke out but
Uwazuruike felt he was challenging him and decided to fight him. But he
(Uwazuruike) did not know that the more he fought Nnamdi and tried to
destroy him, the more God lifted him (Nnamdi) up.
Father’s feelings and message to the Buhari administration
No father will be happy to hear that his child has been arrested. The
first time he was arrested and taken to Abuja, I left my palace and
went to the DSS office in Abuja. I think it was in 2008 or thereabout.
The next day, I was able to meet the person in charge and I explained my
mission that ‘I learnt my son was arrested and being held.’ Eventually
they brought him out of the cell and released him to me, because he did
not do anything. It was Uwazuruike that set him up. But still, he was
tortured before he was released.
He has been visiting Nigeria. He visits home and goes back.
When I read some accounts between Nnamdi and the prosecution, I see
it as when one is fighting with an enemy. They will do or say anything
to put one down. What one can do is try one’s best to overcome. The day
he refused to remove the handcuffs in court until his lawyer told him to
mellow down, I got the information from the newspapers. My children who
were in the court also told me about it.
I have left everything in God’s hands, because nobody should be
killed for saying the truth. He saw the truth and said it, is that why
he should be killed? He has my backing, as long as he is saying the
truth. If they took him to court and the court ordered that he should be
released on bail and they refused to release him, is that really
democracy? Why did they refuse to release him on bail? What do they
want? The president should respect the laws of the land, because he is
the one that should defend the laws. My son is just saying the truth
– he has the right of freedom of speech; they should release him. Nobody
should be killed for saying the truth.
I am pleading that the government should free him, he did not commit
any crime. Maybe the federal government should come to this area and
conduct a plebiscite, and know the feelings of the people.
I can’t advise them (on the Biafra question), but I plead with them to please free my son.
No comments:
Post a Comment